UK-Rwanda refugee agreement is wrong, UN High Commissioner for Refugees TOU

UK-Rwanda refugee agreement is wrong, UN High Commissioner for Refugees
 TOU

UK-Rwanda refugee agreement is wrong, UN High Commissioner for Refugees

The criticism of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) comes as some senior judges in the UK have approved the government’s plan to fly a plane carrying some asylum seekers to Rwanda on June 14.

A UK High Court judge on Friday rejected a petition seeking a temporary stay on the first flight. And, according to reports, an appellate court on Monday upheld the decision.

A full legal hearing on this controversial policy is scheduled for July.

UN High Commissioner for Refugees Filippo Grandi said in Geneva on Monday, “On the Rwanda issue, I think we have been very clear over the last few weeks that we believe this is all wrong, for a number of reasons.”

International intervention

Filippo Grande pointed out that the UK International Convention on Refugees As a signatory country, efforts to “export” its responsibilities are contrary to the concept of responsibility and the principle of international responsibility.

He noted that while Rwanda has a history of welcoming thousands of Congolese and Burundi refugees and examining their documents, the country still has the capacity or framework to assess the status of refugees. No, which is required for separate investigation and assessment of each case.

Irresponsible

The UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) said: “If the situation were reversed, we could have negotiated, but here we are talking about a country (UK) that has the framework, yet it has shifted its responsibilities to another country, Rwanda. Exporting. ”

Filippo Grande also rejected the UK government’s argument that the policy was intended to protect people from the dangerous English Channel boat trips they had to take to enter Britain from mainland Europe.

He said, “I mean, it’s really good to save people from dangerous journeys, but is this the right way to do it? Is that really the intent behind this agreement? I don’t think so. ”

On this issue, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) called for greater dialogue between the UK and French governments, as most of the refugees affected by the scheme arrive in the UK through France.

He also pointed out that France also has a proper framework to help refugees.

When the plan was announced, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson had said that the 16 160 million plan would save the lives of countless migrants, who often fall into the hands of illegal human traffickers.

Legal options

Filippo Grande stated that while the situation is complicated, there are still many options for refugees and asylum seekers through which they can go to their relatives already living in the UK and European countries.

He said, “On all these issues, there is a need for bilateral talks between the UK and the European countries concerned; We have made ourselves available many times to provide advice in this regard, this is the way forward on this matter. ”

if you want to read this article from the original credit source of the article then you can read from here.

Best Offer Mansoon Sell Today Up to 75% Off



Leave a Reply