Is confirmation pro or fascinating invention? North, Archeology at the Danish site TOU

Is confirmation pro or fascinating invention?  North, Archeology at the Danish site

 TOU

Is confirmation pro or fascinating invention? North, Archeology at the Danish site

In 2020, while I was still working at a small natural history museum in Hot Springs, South Dakota, I began to hear potential site gossip on the very day the dinosaurs became extinct. Call me a cynic, but immediately I was deeply skeptical of the invention. So I started asking local fielders in the area if they had heard anything. By and large, the consensus in that community then and today is a humorous one. “Discovery” with its introduction New Yorker In 2019, and not Journal of Vertebrate PaleontologyOne might mistake this article for an April Fools’ Day joke.

Everyone wants to be Indiana Jones or Alan Grant. So, we become archaeologists and archaeologists to discover and share the best story of life on earth, and sometimes show more involvement in our story instead of the story of the earth. The history of vertebrate archeology is divided into peer-reviewed science-based theories and ego-based theories. These issues were the inspiration for 1986 Dinosaur fanaticism Renowned archaeologist Dr. Bob Packer challenged many time-value theories regarding dinosaurs.

Just this week, I was digging a bone bed in an unknown area of ​​Los Angeles County. During the excavation, we encountered different types of creatures. I noticed that Smiley and Tetradornis (ancestor of California Condor) and I began to daydream about how the bone bed should be made. Not too long ago, every new bone I discovered seemed to lead me to daydream more and more fascinating stories about the deposition of the site, and I realized that I had fallen directly into a confirmation pro web.

As a result of my ecstatic excitement about this discovery, I came up with an attractive conclusion – the site was 1000 years flooded from the LA River – not using the scientific method. The real answer was less glamorous, but more meaningful, it was a lattice bed of the LA River that became a natural trap for seasonal flooding; No disaster to speak of. This is how our ego affects our work as scientists. Sometimes, we begin to see what we want to see Layers.

Before I get to the site, I need to talk about the public-private divide in archeology and how it obscures the judgment of people on both sides. Historically, private collectors and museum educators worked hand in hand as nature lovers. Unfortunately, in the modern era, museums around the world have stopped buying pieces from private collectors due to the liquidation of money. This provoked a long-running rift, with both groups staring blankly at each other. Museums see collectors as looters, in many cases this is the correct assumption, but not all, and private collectors see museum educators as very elite, and many of the fossils are destroyed. Unfortunately, they are also right in many cases. This is important to know as most of the authors of the article are well versed in the private field of archeology. Dipalma, the first author, “invented” the Dacodopter, which ended up being a giant tortoise and has a long history of selling fossils. Peter Larson, a man I personally respect the most, is also a co-author of this article. He is notorious for his discovery of the most complete and second-most complete – Tyrannosaurus Rex skeletons, but also for his controversial status in the academic community for sometimes presenting ideas located on the fringes of antiquity.

The Danish base is located in southwest North Dakota. It can even be said to be a neatly preserved, transparent kar fish with a river sand canal with a well-preserved cluster. Occasionally there are shark teeth, shell pieces and worm holes. Is strange More info Rather than follow up on the findings found in the 2019 New Yorker article Peer-reviewed article By Diploma and colleagues later that year. Dipalma says the site coincides with the tsunami-induced uprising, which attracts claims for the site with multiple pronounced events. The backbone of his argument, which compares the site to a “day of impact”, relies on the shocking quartz and glass “sheriffs” found in the gills of fossil fish and sediment layers.

This is very similar to the argument used to support it Very competitive Junior Trias event. “Sericles” are more common than previously thought and can be found in almost any sediment that were not frequently sampled in Hell Creek formation. Further study from the sedimentary layers in the Danes, and comparisons with layers of other sections of the Hell Creek formation, are necessary to reflect and / or support the findings of Dipalma. Dipalma’s argument relates to these sites K / Pg limit It is similar to Randall Carlson’s denied interpretation of the Pleistocene impact. However, as with having a diploma, there are some issues with access to possible further study or admission Contract control You can select models and those with access.

Almost everyone is interested in science, which is part of our natural instinct to want to understand our world. As the current state of science education in this country has been greatly affected in recent times, people are drawn to quick and digestible content to learn more about the natural world, but this content may not always be accurate or representative of reality. All you have to do is type “archeology” in the search bar on YouTube. As more details about the Danish site come out there is no doubt that it is a fascinating site where we can learn a lot about the past. Steve Bruce, a professor at the University of Edinburgh, is skeptical when praising the many findings from the site that are incredible. He asked, “Is it okay if they die the day before or for many years? A pterosaur egg with a pterosaur baby inside is very rare; Nothing more than North America. All of this does not have to be about asteroids.

Perhaps in the future, skeptics like me could change their minds, however, for now, as a professional archaeologist, I’m back in 2020, so I’m still skeptical about the validity of Diploma’s claims.

The documentary about the site and its findings airs tomorrow (Friday, April 15). On the BBC.

proof’s: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, The New York Times, Scientific advances, New Yorker, Britannica, Smithsonian Magazine, Business Insider,

Further reading findings on the Danish site: Science News April 2, 2019, Science News April 26, 2019, Dipalma, r. And others. In 2019 PNAS, When, M., and. Al. 2022 in nature, Science April 1, 2019

                </div>

if you want to read this article from the original credit source of the article then you can read from here

.

Leave a Reply