CCP’s Ukraine war propaganda TOU

CCP’s Ukraine war propaganda


CCP’s Ukraine war propaganda

The giant of China Information control The device typically focuses on distorting information that Chinese citizens are able to access about their own country, with foreign affairs given secondary importance. Yet in the last seven weeks, the clear decision of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leadership to side with Russian President Vladimir Putin in their unprovoked invasion of Ukraine has given rise to a full-blown campaign to shape public opinion and internet nonsense about events thousands of miles away. Away

Within the deep toolbox of controls available to the CCP regime, three tactics seem to be playing a major role in this campaign: flagship state media echoes Russian state disinformation, manipulation of social media hashtags and trending topics, and informational perspectives and alternative perspectives. .

The effort has effectively built a separate wall around China, giving Chinese news consumers an image of one of the most important geopolitical events of the century, very different from the version presented to other populations around the world.

A three-pronged strategy to distort reality

In the weeks following Putin’s invasion of Ukraine, three Chinese state media outlets – the CCP mouthpiece People’s Daily, the national broadcaster China Central Television (CCTV), and the nationalist tabloid Global Times – China’s news is particularly active in feeding consumers Russian state propaganda. Instead of merely promoting Moscow’s official views or statements, they have disseminated material that contains multiple falsehoods. For example, they have broadcast claims that Ukrainian soldiers have surrendered their weapons, or that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky Kiev fledAnd those Russian forces have only attacked military targets.


p class=”td-ad-inline td-ad-inline-txt ng-hide”>Enjoying this article? Click here to subscribe for full access. Only $ 5 per month.

Just as noteworthy as the lies that have been propagated are the basic facts that are missing. There is no acknowledgment that Moscow started the war by invading its sovereign neighbor in clear violation of international law. No airtime is provided for Zelensky Impressive daily video shows that have gone viral in a global audience. Detailed reports of atrocities in the Kiev region, which emerged after the retreat of captured Russian troops, are also absent. Multiple CCTV news broadcast – including a prime-time program that is still watched by millions of Chinese every evening – for example, almost no mention of civilian deaths reported in the city of Bucha in early April. Instead, they focused on topics such as successful Russian military strikes and the shipment of US weapons to Ukraine.

The CCP regime has helped spread pro-Kremlin propaganda by manipulating hashtags and trending topics on local social media platforms. There are numerous instances where Chinese state outlets have created hashtags associated with obscure information which then aggressively expands. In the early days of the war, CCTV created a hashtag claiming that Zelensky had fled Kiev, according to the report. 510 million views Most recently, the Russian government announced that it would host one Anti-fascist Conference In August – CCTV posted a related story and created a hashtag on the Weibo social media platform – part of his vague description of the need for an invasion to liberate Ukraine from the Nazis. Within 24 hours, it reportedly received 650 million views and 90 media citations.

Although they align their algorithms and trending topics with government priorities, staff on Chinese social media platforms are busy deleting content that deviates from the official line. Among other targets, they have removed posts and Open letters Leading figures inside China, who directly questioned the government’s support for Moscow, criticized Putin, backed Ukraine, or ignored nationalist netizens over China’s own historical suffering at the hands of foreign invaders. In At least two cases, Celebrities who have called Putin “insane”, urged followers to pray for peace, or posted photos of anti-war protests in Russia, had their Weibo accounts suspended or blocked. Two individuals, former talk-show host Jin Xing and actress K Lane, lost their ability to reach 13.6 million and 2.9 million followers, respectively. Some pro-terrorist Moscow Post has also been taken down, but The main story The censored and perverted Chinese on the Internet are pro-Kremlin, anti-US and anti-NATO.

Censors have similarly stepped in to suppress first-hand reporting, including complaints to the government by Chinese residents in Ukraine. Delayed assistance With their migration from the war zone. Posting a video from the city of Odessa, technology worker Wang Jixian learned that his social media accounts on multiple platforms, including WeChat, had been shut down. In Emotional video Posting on YouTube, Wang angrily lamented the fact that he no longer had a way to communicate directly with his parents, telling friends to warn them that he was still alive. Personal Netizens Posts And Video On Jinri Toutiao, widely used content aggregator owned by Byddance, has been removed for protesting against Russian war.

This data-control strategy closely matches the set of official media directives leaked since March 3. A Point In particular, foreign news reports cannot be republished, and social media platforms should “strictly control” comments challenging official statements, including “provocations of Sino-Russian hostility”, references to China’s historic aggression, or “anti-war rhetoric.” Have. “This and Other points The state media monopolizes both war-related hashtags and trending topics, noting that “existing hashtags initiated by individuals, self-published media and commercial platforms should not be included in trending topics, and new hashtags are strictly enforced, without exception.” Applies. Restricted. ”

The voice of dissent and resistance

While the space for an alternative perspective on the war in Ukraine is clearly under heavy pressure, some examples of both voice and silent resistance have emerged.

In the traditional media, a small number of outlets have explicitly mentioned Moscow’s responsibility for the invasion. Xinmin Weekly, A commercial publication in Shanghai, publishes a March 7 human interest story about a Chinese student fleeing Ukraine, describing how Russian forces suddenly “started a war” against Ukraine. Kexin, a financial publication widely known for its investigative journalism, ran a cover-story analysis that framed and published the war as a full-scale Russian invasion. Photo galleries Displays destroyed buildings.

Ongoing 26 February, Five Chinese historians published an open letter condemning the war and directly challenging the position of the Chinese government. “As a country that was once devastated by war … we sympathize with the suffering of the Ukrainian people,” he said. The authors also explicitly deny attempts to justify the invasion: “The use of force to invade a sovereign country, regardless of Russia’s numerous reasons and all sorts of excuses, is violating the norms of international relations based on the UN Charter.”

In early March, the Carter Center’s US-China Perceptions Monitor published a comment English And Chinese By Hu Wei, a scholar of several state-affiliated institutions in China. This section analyzes the long-term effects of the war for China and the world, warns that “China cannot be linked to Putin” and “should choose a mainstream world position.” Both were commentary Censored In China, and the US-China Perceptions Monitor’s website followed BlockedBut not before his original Chinese post was received Over 185,000 views.

Enjoying this article? Click here to subscribe for full access. Only $ 5 per month.

There have also been more subtle expressions of skepticism about the official line and support for Ukraine. Journalist Zifan Yang Discovered that four of the top five brooch pins on the e-commerce site Taobao have a Ukrainian flag theme. In the comments of users on the items “Long live the people of Ukraine!” Includes such statements. Researcher Ling Ltd. Chinese netizens collected multiple examples of commentary that departed from the official narrative, including comments such as “one may be indifferent to wars but at least not favor war, or worse, praise the invaders” with over 6,900 likes. Have found. A video of the Hollywood star and former California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger was also seen, aimed at countering the Kremlin’s propaganda among Russian audiences. Rotating on WeChat With subtitles in Chinese.

A window on the views of leaders, a barrier to the world

Given the ambiguity of the Chinese leadership, it is difficult to determine the exact motives for running the regime’s support for Putin’s war. It could be part of an effort to upset the international balance of power, weaken the United States, set the stage for a future CCP takeover of Taiwan, or embarrass Xi Jinping over a very public partnership with Putin. Trumpeted in early February before the invasion. What is clear is that the story of the local media reflects the views of CCP leaders more than the superficially neutral and mild public comments of Chinese diplomats. Once Xi and his group decided that throwing their weight behind Putin was strategically advantageous for the CCP, if not for China, the party’s information control device was pushed into action.

As the war continues in Ukraine, there is a great danger to independence, peace and the international order. But regardless of the outcome on the battlefield, the conflict already has a reinforced CCP propaganda structure and widespread Information distance Among many in China and the rest of the world.


if you want to read this article from the original credit source of the article then you can read from here.

Leave a Reply