Buzz Update Tried the #MeToo comeback with Charlie Rose Warren Buffett TOU

Buzz Update Tried the #MeToo comeback with Charlie Rose Warren Buffett


Tried the #MeToo comeback with Charlie Rose Warren Buffett

The infamous journalist Charlie Rose has launched a comeback attempt almost five years after he was fired by both CBS and PBS amid allegations of sexual misconduct in the wake of the #MeToo movement.

Rose, who turned 80 in January Posted a 75 minute interview With 91-year-old business tycoon Warren Buffett on his personal website on Thursday. In it, Rose asks him about fellow billionaire Bigwigs and space jockeys Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos, while the two talk about his career.

“I’m proud to share this recent conversation with Warren Buffett,” Rose wrote in an introduction to the chat on his website – beginning the series with “Charlie Rose Conversations”. “This is his first interview on camera in almost a year and the first interview I’ve done in four years. It’s a step in a journey to engage the most interesting people and explore the most fascinating ideas in the world.”

Rose, a former “CBS This Morning” anchor and host of her own self-titled talk show on public television, was “fired” from her top positions in November 2017 after being damaged by allegations of unwanted sexual development.

Charlie Rose tried to come back by posting an interview with business tycoon Warren Buffett on his website.
Charlie Rose spoke to Warren Buffett in a 75-minute interview posted on the former website.
Charlie Rose spoke to Warren Buffett in a 75-minute interview posted on the former website.

Not everyone was thrilled when Rose returned to airing even on his own streaming platform.

“Once again, I ask, how is that whole abolitionist culture going to the people?” Author Rebecca Carroll tweetedAnother social media commentator Added their own snork: “Look at how the culture of dissolution has ruined the careers of men like Charlie Rose and Louis CK. It’s very sad, ”he said, referring to a recent Grammy Award-winning comedy article, despite allegations of sexual misconduct against him.

Others Called Buffett For even agreeing to sit-down Face to face.

“What is wrong # Warren Buffett? Hundreds of reputable journalists who did not sexually harass women were available and he chose to give interviews # Charlie Rose? “Wrote a commentator on their profile who claims to be a retired journalist.” Please let Rose crawl back under the rock she hid for the last 4 years – and stay there. # I too

During the interview, the discussion never touched on any of the allegations against Rose. Instead, Buffett was led by a speaker who spoke openly about aging and its effects on him, acknowledging that his “happiness” was still intact despite his departure.

“I’m stupid, but I’m smart,” he said, his memory and more not as good as they had been in the past.

“I’m a rotting machine that still feels awesome,” he continued. “But I can not hear as well, I can not see as well. My balance is not so good, but it does not interfere with my happiness, my work – nothing.”

He also said that some forms of 21st century communication are beyond his expertise.

“I do not know how to send emails,” he admitted with a smile. “I literally don’t know how to send an email.”

When Rose asked him how he felt when people called him a “genius”, business leader Buffett dismissed the idea – and even suggested that he did not rely on the brain to sustain his work range performance.

“I am a bright person Terribly He was interested in what he was doing, so I spent a lifetime for it. I surround myself with people who uncover the best in me – and you do not have to be a genius in what I do, ”he responded. “That’s a good thing about it. If I went into physics or other subjects, I’d run too. But I’m in a game you don’t need – you probably need a 120 point IQ. But 170 doesn’t do any better than 120. It could be worse – maybe worse. But you don’t really need a brain.

if you want to read this article from the original credit source of the article then you can read from here.

Leave a Reply